<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for blog.richardramdat.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.richardramdat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Disable javascript debugging Visual Studio 2008 + IE8 by Irvin Bassett</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2009/04/disable-javascript-debugging-visual-studio-2008-ie8/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Irvin Bassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=70#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I am so grateful for your blog article.Thanks Again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so grateful for your blog article.Thanks Again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint List Querying &#8211; Linq vs. CAML by Somnath Panja</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2009/09/sharepoint-list-querying-linq-vs-caml/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Somnath Panja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=154#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Good One! I found the concept what I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good One! I found the concept what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IIS 7 Worker Processes &#8211; Category does not exist by Farzad Jalali</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/06/iis-7-worker-processes-category-does-not-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Farzad Jalali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=204#comment-522</guid>
		<description>one more thing when I run the second command , I still see that it  is disabled  ( so I think the second command doesn&#039;t make it enabled )

Thanks
Farzad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one more thing when I run the second command , I still see that it  is disabled  ( so I think the second command doesn&#8217;t make it enabled )</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Farzad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IIS 7 Worker Processes &#8211; Category does not exist by Farzad Jalali</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/06/iis-7-worker-processes-category-does-not-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Farzad Jalali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=204#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Hi 

I got the same problem and when I run the following command:
lodctr /q:PerfProc
I saw that it has disabled so I fired the second command which is : 
lodctr /e:PerfProc

I closed all IIS and reopend tham but nothing happened and I got the same error message.

did I do something wrong ?


here is a copy of my command line screen:


C:\Users\fjalali&gt;lodctr /q:PerfProc
Performance Counter ID Queries [PERFLIB]:
    Base Index: 0x00000737 (1847)
    Last Counter Text ID: 0x00002BB0 (11184)
    Last Help Text ID: 0x00002BB1 (11185)

[PerfProc] Performance Counters (Disabled)
    DLL Name: perfproc.dll
    Open Procedure: OpenSysProcessObject
    Collect Procedure: CollectSysProcessObjectData
    Close Procedure: CloseSysProcessObject


C:\Users\fjalali&gt;lodctr /e:PerfProc

C:\Users\fjalali&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>I got the same problem and when I run the following command:<br />
lodctr /q:PerfProc<br />
I saw that it has disabled so I fired the second command which is :<br />
lodctr /e:PerfProc</p>
<p>I closed all IIS and reopend tham but nothing happened and I got the same error message.</p>
<p>did I do something wrong ?</p>
<p>here is a copy of my command line screen:</p>
<p>C:\Users\fjalali&gt;lodctr /q:PerfProc<br />
Performance Counter ID Queries [PERFLIB]:<br />
    Base Index: 0&#215;00000737 (1847)<br />
    Last Counter Text ID: 0&#215;00002BB0 (11184)<br />
    Last Help Text ID: 0&#215;00002BB1 (11185)</p>
<p>[PerfProc] Performance Counters (Disabled)<br />
    DLL Name: perfproc.dll<br />
    Open Procedure: OpenSysProcessObject<br />
    Collect Procedure: CollectSysProcessObjectData<br />
    Close Procedure: CloseSysProcessObject</p>
<p>C:\Users\fjalali&gt;lodctr /e:PerfProc</p>
<p>C:\Users\fjalali&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MongooseJS Validation by Branko</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2011/05/mongoosejs-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=276#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Validating virtual fields with middleware isn&#039;t the ideal solution, since validation doesn&#039;t take place at the same time as normal validators (for example, if you are displaying errors for individual form fields, you won&#039;t catch the error on any field that is associated with a virtual field), and the model data is lost once the middleware validator fails (in case of forms, if you load field values from a model, you will have blank fields). But I guess it&#039;s better than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Validating virtual fields with middleware isn&#8217;t the ideal solution, since validation doesn&#8217;t take place at the same time as normal validators (for example, if you are displaying errors for individual form fields, you won&#8217;t catch the error on any field that is associated with a virtual field), and the model data is lost once the middleware validator fails (in case of forms, if you load field values from a model, you will have blank fields). But I guess it&#8217;s better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Error Delete Site WebDeleted.aspx File Not Found by Dennis Flagg</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/01/sharepoint-error-delete-site-webdeleted-aspx-file-not-found/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Flagg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=196#comment-518</guid>
		<description>When receiving the File not found error, it is important to look at the stack trace carefully.  It gives clues as to what the problem is.  It would be nice if it indicated what the actual problem was, but this is SharePoint.  If the stack trace indicates that it&#039;s failing when trying to open a SPSite/SPWeb then there might be controls on your custom simple.master page that can&#039;t render.  They can&#039;t render because they assume that the site/web still exist, and then try to get a reference to it.  Take a look at how the url is structured, http://mydomain/sitename/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx.  The virtual directory, _layouts, is getting accessed by a site that doesn&#039;t exist anymore. This is why the out of the box webdeleted page doesn&#039;t have controls on it that reference the current site. Take a look at the code for the simple.master and the webdeleted.aspx file.  Everything in them is either static or non-site specific.  You can test this very easy to see if this is your problem.  Create a new site, then in the browser type http://mydomain/newsite/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx.  This will not delete the site, but it will display a deleted confirmation page. If the confirmation page renders without the file not found error, then this is most likely the issue.  To fix this, go into the custom simple.master and remove anything that is site specific. For example site actions buttons or access to lists in the current context.   Happy coding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When receiving the File not found error, it is important to look at the stack trace carefully.  It gives clues as to what the problem is.  It would be nice if it indicated what the actual problem was, but this is SharePoint.  If the stack trace indicates that it&#8217;s failing when trying to open a SPSite/SPWeb then there might be controls on your custom simple.master page that can&#8217;t render.  They can&#8217;t render because they assume that the site/web still exist, and then try to get a reference to it.  Take a look at how the url is structured, <a href="http://mydomain/sitename/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://mydomain/sitename/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx</a>.  The virtual directory, _layouts, is getting accessed by a site that doesn&#8217;t exist anymore. This is why the out of the box webdeleted page doesn&#8217;t have controls on it that reference the current site. Take a look at the code for the simple.master and the webdeleted.aspx file.  Everything in them is either static or non-site specific.  You can test this very easy to see if this is your problem.  Create a new site, then in the browser type <a href="http://mydomain/newsite/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://mydomain/newsite/_layouts/webdeleted.aspx</a>.  This will not delete the site, but it will display a deleted confirmation page. If the confirmation page renders without the file not found error, then this is most likely the issue.  To fix this, go into the custom simple.master and remove anything that is site specific. For example site actions buttons or access to lists in the current context.   Happy coding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint CAML Query Date by dusty</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/01/sharepoint-caml-query-date/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=193#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Thanks this helped me with an issue I was having where things with today&#039;s date were not showing in the response. I added IncludeTimeValue=&#039;True&#039; and everything is working sweet now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks this helped me with an issue I was having where things with today&#8217;s date were not showing in the response. I added IncludeTimeValue=&#8217;True&#8217; and everything is working sweet now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IIS 7 Worker Processes &#8211; Category does not exist by w3wp.exe, welk domein gebruikt de cpu het meest - webhostingtalk.nl</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/06/iis-7-worker-processes-category-does-not-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>w3wp.exe, welk domein gebruikt de cpu het meest - webhostingtalk.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=204#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Error Delete Site WebDeleted.aspx File Not Found by richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/01/sharepoint-error-delete-site-webdeleted-aspx-file-not-found/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=196#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Hi Kay, we left any page using simple.master unbranded. Most pages using simple.master are restricted to the site administrators, so users typically will never see those pages (like a confirmation page that a site has been deleted).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kay, we left any page using simple.master unbranded. Most pages using simple.master are restricted to the site administrators, so users typically will never see those pages (like a confirmation page that a site has been deleted).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Error Delete Site WebDeleted.aspx File Not Found by Kay</title>
		<link>http://blog.richardramdat.com/2010/01/sharepoint-error-delete-site-webdeleted-aspx-file-not-found/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.richardramdat.com/?p=196#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I am running into the same problem.  How did you get your custom branding accomplished without hardcoding these changes into the base default simple.master file?

Thank you.
Kay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running into the same problem.  How did you get your custom branding accomplished without hardcoding these changes into the base default simple.master file?</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Kay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

